๐๏ธ
California
Guidance IssuedstateState Bar of California
Ethics Opinions & Guidance
Practical Guidance for Using Generative AI
Practical Guidance 2023-1 ยท 2023
The State Bar of California issued practical guidance for attorneys using generative AI, addressing competence, confidentiality, supervision, and billing obligations.
View full opinionKey Requirements for Attorneys
- 1Competence under Rule 1.1 โ attorneys must understand AI tool limitations
- 2Confidentiality under Rule 1.6 โ no confidential client data in AI without safeguards
- 3Supervision under Rule 5.1/5.3 โ supervise AI output as you would non-lawyer work
- 4Fees under Rule 1.5 โ AI savings should not inflate billing
- 5Candor to tribunal โ verify AI-generated citations before filing
Additional Context
California is proactive in issuing AI guidance but has not issued a formal ethics opinion restricting AI use. The State Bar actively monitors developments.
AI Tools Used in California
โญ FeaturedSponsored
โญ Featured
Disclaimer: Jurisdiction guidance is based on publicly available bar opinions and regulatory statements. This information may not reflect the most current guidance. Always consult directly with your state or local bar association for authoritative advice on your ethical obligations. LexAI Hub is not a law firm and this content does not constitute legal advice.