AI Built for the Practice of Law

Note: New York courts have issued standing orders requiring disclosure of AI use. The NYSBA Task Force on Artificial Intelligence monitors ongoing developments.

Note: Texas federal courts, including the Northern District, have adopted standing orders requiring disclosure of AI use in filings.

Note: Florida Supreme Court has not yet issued a formal rule on AI disclosure, but the Bar's committee continues monitoring developments.

Note: Chicago-area courts are actively developing local rules on AI use in litigation.

Note: Federal agencies in DC are increasingly scrutinizing AI use in regulated industries. Federal court filings require AI disclosure in many courts.

Note: UK AI regulation is developing through the AI Safety Act framework. GDPR compliance is mandatory for all AI tools. Bar Council and Law Society both active on AI guidance.

Note: The EU AI Act categorizes many legal AI tools as high-risk, requiring conformity assessments. GDPR is strictly enforced for any AI tool processing personal data.

Note: Clio is headquartered in Canada and is purpose-built for Canadian law firms. Provincial law societies may have additional requirements beyond federal guidance.

Note: Australia is developing a national AI regulatory framework. State bar associations each have their own guidance. The Privacy Act reform may impact AI data handling requirements.