๐๏ธ
Washington D.C.
Guidance IssuedfederalDistrict of Columbia Bar
Ethics Opinions & Guidance
Attorneys' Use of Artificial Intelligence
DC Bar Ethics Opinion 388 ยท 2024
The DC Bar issued formal guidance on the ethical use of AI tools, including analysis of confidentiality obligations and the duty of supervision.
View full opinionKey Requirements for Attorneys
- 1Rule 1.1 โ technology competence is part of the duty of competence
- 2Rule 1.6 โ confidentiality obligations extend to AI platform data handling
- 3Rule 5.3 โ supervise AI output as you would a non-lawyer assistant
- 4Rule 3.3 โ verify all AI-generated case citations before filing
Additional Context
Federal agencies in DC are increasingly scrutinizing AI use in regulated industries. Federal court filings require AI disclosure in many courts.
AI Tools Used in Washington D.C.
โญ Featured
โญ FeaturedSponsored
Disclaimer: Jurisdiction guidance is based on publicly available bar opinions and regulatory statements. This information may not reflect the most current guidance. Always consult directly with your state or local bar association for authoritative advice on your ethical obligations. LexAI Hub is not a law firm and this content does not constitute legal advice.